Surrogacy Guide Colombia

Surrogacy ethics: what to ask before you choose a provider

People and institutions disagree about surrogacy. This guide sets out the debate, the questions that every international arrangement raises, and the minimum conditions we look for. We do not take a side in the debate.

Short answer. Experts disagree. A 2025 UN report urges a ban, while the American Society for Reproductive Medicine says surrogacy can be ethical with informed consent, independent legal advice and support. Colombia's Court and child welfare agency warn of risks. We set minimum conditions for any provider and say where sources disagree.

  • Updated
  • Sources cited in the text

Not legal or medical advice. This guide is written by an independent publisher, not by a lawyer or doctor. Surrogacy law abroad is unsettled and changes. Talk to an attorney in the country where the surrogacy will happen and to an attorney in your home state before making any decision.

Is surrogacy ethical?

There is no agreed answer. Critics argue that surrogacy turns a woman's body and reproductive capacity into a service and that international arrangements deepen inequalities between wealthy parents and poorer carriers. A 2025 report by the UN Special Rapporteur on violence against women and girls, Reem Alsalem (A/80/158), asks states to work toward an international binding instrument prohibiting all forms of surrogacy (IPS News, Sept. 2025). We have not read the full report. Scholars quoted in the same article disagree. They say a full ban would harm women and call for oversight, safeguards and long-term health coverage for carriers.

Professional bodies take a different view. The American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM) says gestational carrier arrangements are ethically justifiable when the carrier gets all material information, gives fully informed consent and receives legal advice, health care, emotional support and counseling. It says she needs her own lawyer, is the sole source of consent for her medical care and that paying her is ethically defensible if it is not an undue inducement (ASRM ethics opinion, 2023). It also says that where the law does not make the intended parents the legal parents, an arrangement should be considered with caution by all parties and only with independent legal advice.

What do Colombian institutions say?

The Constitutional Court and the child welfare agency (ICBF) do not say surrogacy is wrong. They say the absence of rules creates risks. In T-127 of 2024 the Court warned that surrogacy can lead to the crime of human trafficking, in a form that in practice escapes any type of criminal classification, and urged Congress and the Ministry of Justice to act (T-127). In T-232 of 2024 it said the absence of rules does not excuse the state from its duty to protect a child left stateless (T-232). The ICBF's 2026 guidance lists statelessness, uncertainty about parentage, sale of children, reproductive exploitation of women and trafficking among the risks (ICBF). In T-127 the ICBF also told the Court that the agreement should be altruistic. Colombia's Congress has seen at least 16 bills since 1998, and a bill filed in July 2026 would ban the practice (bill guide).

Is there an international law on surrogacy?

No. The Hague Conference on Private International Law studied a possible convention on legal parentage, including international surrogacy. Its governing council decided on 3 to 6 March 2026 not to start drafting a convention at this stage, and asked its secretariat to monitor developments and report before the 2028 meeting (HCCH). So no treaty tells states whether to recognize a child's parentage across borders.

What five questions does every international arrangement raise?

  1. Is the carrier's consent free and informed? Does she have her own attorney, chosen and paid outside the agency, and does she read the contract in her language?
  2. Is the payment fair and clear? How much, when, who holds the money and what happens if the pregnancy ends early?
  3. Who protects her health? Insurance for complications, medical care of her choice and counseling during and after pregnancy.
  4. What happens to the child's legal identity? Parentage, birth record, nationality and passport. See the citizenship guide.
  5. Who has the power? International parents and agencies usually have more money, information and legal resources than the carrier. Ask how the arrangement balances that.

What does ethical practice look like in a provider?

ConcernWhat to askWhat a good answer looks like
Informed consentHow does the carrier learn the risks and who explains them?Her own attorney and doctor explain, in her language, with time to decide.
Fair payHow is she paid and by whom?A written schedule, held by a neutral party, not tied to the baby's health.
ExploitationHow are carriers recruited?No recruitment by pressure or by debt; her own reasons are heard; no confinement.
Child's identityWhat records of origin are kept and for how long?Records are kept safely, and the child can later learn their origins.
TransparencyWho owns the agency and who profits?Names, company details and fees are public.
AccountabilityWhere do I complain, and what happens to a provider that breaks the rules?A written complaint path and a refund policy.

Should intended parents think about their own role?

Yes. Ask yourself whether you would still go ahead if the carrier's legal protections were thinner than at home, if a court decided against you or if a ban made your provider shut down. Ask whether you are comfortable with how money moves and whether you will keep contact or tell your child the story. These are personal questions. Our role is to help you ask them before you pay.

What does this mean for how we run this site?

We do not recruit surrogates. We do not charge per baby or per result. We accept no sponsorship or paid ranking, and listed providers would pay the same flat fee. Read the ethics policy. If you see a provider that falls short, write to us from the contact page.

What about the child's identity and origins?

A child born through surrogacy may later want to know who the donors and the carrier were. The ICBF lists the rights to identity and to know one's origins among those that can be harmed when records are not kept (ICBF). The 2026 draft ban would create a national registry that the child could consult after reaching adulthood (bill, art. 11). It is not law. Ask each provider what records it keeps about the donors and the carrier, how long it keeps them and what the child can access. Decide in advance how you will tell your child their story.

How can you weigh the debate for your own decision?

You do not need to resolve the debate to act with care. Some families conclude that the risks of an unsettled legal system and the power gap are too great and choose another path (alternatives are listed in the process guide). Others go ahead with safeguards: independent attorneys, a neutral money holder, health coverage and counseling for the carrier, and a legal route for the child. Both decisions can be thoughtful. What is not defensible is to decide without asking the questions above.

What can intended parents do if exploitation is a concern?

You cannot remove the power gap, but you can narrow it. Ask to see that the carrier has her own attorney and has met that attorney without the agency in the room. Ask how she heard about the program and whether anyone was paid for recruiting her. Ask how payment is set and who can change it. Ask whether she has counseling and a person she can call who is not paid by you. Pay on time and in full according to the contract, and keep records. If an answer is vague or the provider is annoyed by the question, treat that as information. You can also ask your own attorney to review the carrier\'s contract for fairness, even though she is not your client. See surrogate protections for a fuller list and what you pay for for how money should be held.

Key takeaways

  • The ethical debate is real and unresolved. We do not take a side.
  • Professional bodies set conditions: informed consent, independent counsel, support and fair pay.
  • Colombia's Court and ICBF warn of risks caused by the lack of rules.
  • No treaty exists. The Hague Conference decided not to draft one for now.

What to ask

  1. How do you make sure the carrier's consent is free?
  2. How do you protect her health and pay?
  3. What do you keep as records for the child?
  4. What do you do if the law changes?

Common mistakes

  • Treating ethics as a box that the agency ticks for you.
  • Assuming a legal arrangement is an ethical one, or the opposite.
  • Ignoring the power gap between parents and carrier.

Next step

Read what a surrogate should have and the provider checklist.

Frequently asked questions

Is surrogacy ethical?

People and institutions disagree. A 2025 UN rapporteur report urges states to work toward a treaty banning all surrogacy, while the American Society for Reproductive Medicine says gestational carrier arrangements can be ethically justified with informed consent, independent legal advice, health care and support. We do not take a side. We set minimum conditions for providers.

Is it ethical to pay a surrogate?

ASRM says compensation is ethically defensible if it is not an undue inducement and does not depend on a healthy baby. Critics say any payment commodifies women. In Colombia, sources disagree on whether a carrier may be paid or only reimbursed. Ask a local attorney how it works in your contract.

Is there an international law on surrogacy?

No. The Hague Conference studied a convention on legal parentage, including international surrogacy. In March 2026 its council decided not to start drafting one for now and asked for monitoring until 2028. Each country decides for itself, which is why your attorneys matter.

What does the Colombian Constitutional Court say about the ethics of surrogacy?

In T-127 of 2024 it warned that surrogacy can lead to human trafficking when no one controls what happens to the newborn, and urged Congress to act. In T-232 it stressed the state must protect a stateless child despite the lack of rules. It has not banned or approved the practice.

Is international surrogacy exploitative?

Critics say it can be, because parents and agencies usually have more money and legal resources than carriers. Others say bans push the practice into informality. We cannot settle that. We ask providers how they protect the carrier with her own attorney, fair pay, health coverage and counseling.

What should an ethical provider show me?

It should show the carrier has her own independent attorney, a written contract in her language, clear payment through a neutral holder, health coverage and counseling, verifiable licenses, company details and a complaint path. Ask for each in writing and verify it yourself.

Why do you not recommend providers?

We are an independent information site. We do not recruit surrogates, charge per baby or accept sponsorship. If we list providers later, they must meet published criteria and all pay the same flat fee, which does not depend on inquiries or results. Even then, we cannot vouch for legal results.